Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932429AbbGJN55 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:57:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:37374 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932334AbbGJN5v (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:57:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:57:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Waiman Long Subject: Re: [BUG][tip/master] kernel panic while locking selftest at qspinlock_paravirt.h:137! Message-ID: <20150710135746.GA13461@gmail.com> References: <559FAD5E.3080309@hitachi.com> <20150710130028.GI19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150710130028.GI19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1062 Lines: 30 * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:32:46PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > double unlock: > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > kernel BUG at /home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux-3/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h:137! > > > Call Trace: > > [] __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x1e > > [] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xfa/0x10c > > [] _raw_spin_unlock+0x44/0x64 > > [] double_unlock_spin+0x3d/0x46 > > Cute, but somewhat expected. A double unlock really is a BUG and the PV > spinlock code cannot deal with it. > > Do we want to make double unlock non-fatal unconditionally? No, just don't BUG() out, don't crash the system - generate a warning? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/