Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:34:47 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/14] 3.10.84-stable review
Message-ID: <20150710173447.GG10580@kroah.com>
References: <20150708073102.284623533@linuxfoundation.org>
 <7hy4ipb3n3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7hy4ipb3n3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+89 (0255b37be491) (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 914
Lines: 22

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:13:36AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.84 release.
> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> Boot test results from kernelci.org below. Note that the boot failures
> found are not new failures in this version, so should not block release.

Anything we should be backporting to resolve those failures?  Or does
this kernel version just not really matter for those platforms?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/