Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933198AbbGJVJt (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:09:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44444 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932830AbbGJVJl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:09:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] virt: IRQ bypass manager To: Alex Williamson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <20150710173825.1031.42542.stgit@gimli.home> Cc: eric.auger@st.com, eric.auger@linaro.org, joro@8bytes.org, avi.kivity@gmail.com, feng.wu@intel.com From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <55A0348F.606@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 23:09:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150710173825.1031.42542.stgit@gimli.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 22 On 10/07/2015 19:52, Alex Williamson wrote: > Perhaps if a second consumer comes along that would be justification for > tying it elsewhere in the build system. ARM will obviously need to do > similar. Are there better options? > > Also, there's no maintainer for the top level virt/ directory. Paolo, > would you feel comfortable taking this, maybe with some additional acks? That's okay; alternatively, we can share it since after all you wrote most of it. Paolo > That would probably be the most convenient for merging the consumer code. > Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/