Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753109AbbGKKiM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:38:12 -0400
Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:50995 "EHLO
	mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751626AbbGKKiK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:38:10 -0400
X-Listener-Flag: 11101
Message-ID: <1436611086.17661.3.camel@mtksdaap41>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/6] Document: bindings: DT: Add SMP enable
 method for MT6580 SoC platform
From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        <ibanezchen@gmail.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <heiko@sntech.de>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_wsdupstream@mediatek.com>,
        <marc.ceeeee@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <galak@codeaurora.org>,
        <rchintakuntla@cavium.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 18:38:06 +0800
In-Reply-To: <1435547019.20584.13.camel@mtksdaap41>
References: <Scott Shu <srv_scott.shu@mediatek.com>
	 <1434650481-39421-1-git-send-email-scott.shu@mediatek.com>
	 <1434650481-39421-2-git-send-email-scott.shu@mediatek.com>
	 <1435547019.20584.13.camel@mtksdaap41>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MTK: N
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2038
Lines: 52

On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 11:03 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 02:01 +0800, Scott Shu wrote:
> > For MT6580 SoC platform, the secondary cores are in powered off state
> > as default, so compared with MT65xx series SoC, one new enable method
> > is needed. This method using the SPM (System Power Manager) inside
> > the SCYSYS to control the CPU power.
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> > index ac2903d..fb80b2e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described below.
> >  			    "marvell,armada-380-smp"
> >  			    "marvell,armada-390-smp"
> >  			    "marvell,armada-xp-smp"
> > +			    "mediatek,mt6580-smp"
> >  			    "mediatek,mt65xx-smp"
> >  			    "mediatek,mt81xx-tz-smp"
> >  			    "qcom,gcc-msm8660"
> 
> Hi
> 
> It seems we have 3 different kinds of cpu enable method now, and
> mt65xx-smp doesn't cover all mt65xx series. So maybe it make sense to
> change naming before it got merged.
> 
> Short summary for these methods:
> 
> mt65xx-smp:    	For mt65xx socs which wakeup all cores at boot.
> 		Tested on mt6589 by Matthias.
> mt6580-smp:     Only first core is alive at boot, so need to wakeup
> 		other cores using SPM. AFAIK only for mt6580 now.
> mt81xx-tz-smp:  For soc which wakeup all cores at boot, and have
> 		trustzone firmware. Suitable for mt8127, mt8135.


Hi Matthias, Arnd,

Any suggestion on the naming? Is it ok if I just rename mt65xx-smp to
mt6589-smp since that's the only one we tested?

Joe.C


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/