Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:23:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:23:50 -0500 Received: from mithra.wirex.com ([65.102.14.2]:39697 "EHLO mail.wirex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:23:49 -0500 Message-ID: <3E4763C8.5090100@wirex.com> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:33:12 -0800 From: Crispin Cowan Organization: WireX Communications, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'Christoph Hellwig'" Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, LA Walsh , linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 References: <001001c2d0b0$cf49b190$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org> <3E471F21.4010803@wirex.com> <20030210082140.A16436@infradead.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAF0F7372B709FAE63D089637" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2184 Lines: 59 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAF0F7372B709FAE63D089637 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 'Christoph Hellwig' wrote: >On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:40:17PM -0800, Crispin Cowan wrote: > > >>[move security logic out to a module] It has many nice properties, but is much more invasive to the >>kernel. I think it is a very interesting idea for 2.7, and should be >>floated past the maintainers who will be impacted to see if it has a >>hope in hell. >> >> >*nod* and until we get that gets implemented we should remove the current >mess.. > Am I parsing this correctly, that we actually agree on something? :-) I.e. that the idea of moving all the security logic to a module has merit. Naturally, I disagree that we should remove the current LSM. The current version was designed to be what Linus asked for. Many LSM people like the idea of moving all the security logic out to a module, as it makes the interface much cleaner. But it is also waaay beyond the scope of what Linus asked for. It involves re-factoring so much code that we did not think it could be done correctly on the first try, never mind trying to get many code maintainers to accept much larger patches. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX http://wirex.com/~crispin/ Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html Just say ".Nyet" --------------enigAF0F7372B709FAE63D089637 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+R2PP5ZkfjX2CNDARAVrpAJ9YzJRTunsYKJPxlTBXCMufGUZGEgCeP1v7 9yR9A3BnIc4sPW4WOKq0HnM= =AP7q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAF0F7372B709FAE63D089637-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/