Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 04:53:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 04:53:31 -0500 Received: from denise.shiny.it ([194.20.232.1]:65427 "EHLO denise.shiny.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 04:53:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:03:10 +0100 (CET) From: Giuliano Pochini To: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2. Cc: lkml , Andrea Arcangeli Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 18 > In the time of one disk seek plus half rotational latency > (12 ms) you can do a pretty large amount of reading (>400kB). > This means that for near and medium disk seeks you don't care > all that much about how large the submitted IO is. Track buffers > further reduce this importance. This isn't always true. Removable devices usually have a quite low seek time compared to their raw transfer rate. Bye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/