Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:22:25 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] perf,tool: partial time support
Message-ID: <20150712132225.GA1687@krava.redhat.com>
References: <1436264345-12085-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
 <1436264345-12085-4-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1436264345-12085-4-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 866
Lines: 19

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:19:03AM -0400, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> 
> When multiple events are sampled it may not be needed to collect fine
> grained time stamps on all events. The sample sites are usually nearby.
> It's enough to have time stamps on the regular reference events.
> This patchkit adds the ability to turn off time stamps per event. This
> in term can reduce sampling overhead and the size of the perf.data.

how is this usable in some perf example? I dont get the correlation
between 'refference' and the rest of the events in the report time..

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/