Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:19:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:19:22 -0500 Received: from node181b.a2000.nl ([62.108.24.27]:22686 "EHLO ddx.a2000.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:19:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:28:40 +0100 (CET) From: Stephan van Hienen To: Peter Chubb cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Theodore Ts'o" , tbm@a2000.nu Subject: Re: fsck out of memory In-Reply-To: <15942.46375.478902.665549@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> Message-ID: References: <20030207102858.P18636@schatzie.adilger.int> <15942.46375.478902.665549@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 717 Lines: 15 On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Peter Chubb wrote: > Is there any reason why you're sticking with the 2.4 kernel and ext3? > XFS has been used (on SGI systems) for much longer with large disk > arrays, and I'd expect (linux-specific bugs aside) it to be a more > mature product for this application. i used ext2/3 on all my servers never checked out xfs or reiserfs, so don't really want to check it out an an important server, but if it's better to switch to something else..... ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/