Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751855AbbGMKUc (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:20:32 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]:35426 "EHLO mail-yk0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734AbbGMKU1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:20:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1436778294-47635-2-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> References: <1436778294-47635-1-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> <1436778294-47635-2-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> From: Daniel Kurtz Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:20:07 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gybMJquGYvBjtxXDTcyCVadV5hg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add MediaTek display PWM bindings To: YH Huang Cc: Matthias Brugger , Mark Rutland , Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream , Pawel Moll , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Sascha Hauer , Yingjoe Chen , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3001 Lines: 73 On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:04 PM, YH Huang wrote: > Document the device-tree binding of MediatTek display PWM. > The PWM has one channel to control the backlight brightness for display. > It supports MT8173 and MT6595. > > Signed-off-by: YH Huang > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..aac29dc > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ > +MediaTek display PWM controller > + > +Required properties: > + - compatible: should be "mediatek,-disp-pwm": > + - "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm": found on mt8173 SoC. > + - "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm": found on mt6595 SoC. > + - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers. > + - #pwm-cells: must be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of > + the cell format. > + - clocks: phandle and clock specifier of the PWM reference clock. > + - clock-names: must contain the following: > + - "main": clock used to generate PWM signals. > + - "mm": sync signals from the modules of mmsys. > + - pinctrl-names: Must contain a "default" entry. > + - pinctrl-0: One property must exist for each entry in pinctrl-names. > + See pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt for details of the property values. > + > +Example: > + pwm0: pwm@1401e000 { > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", > + "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm"; > + reg = <0 0x1401e000 0 0x1000>; > + #pwm-cells = <2>; > + clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_PWM026M>, > + <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_PWM0MM>; > + clock-names = "main", "mm"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&disp_pwm0_pins>; > + }; Please show an example consumer of the pwm phandle to show how to set the two properties required by the #pwm-cells. Although the pwm-specifier typically encodes the chip-relative PWM number and the PWM period in nanoseconds, it is technically controller specific. In fact, since the mtk-disp-pwm does not have a chip-relative PWM number, could we in fact set #pwm-cells = <1>, and only specify the requested PWM period? -Dan > -- > 1.8.1.1.dirty > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/