Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:37:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:37:07 -0500 Received: from sun.fadata.bg ([80.72.64.67]:34452 "EHLO freon") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:37:07 -0500 To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Dave Jones , linux-kernel , lse-tech Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance References: <336780000.1044313506@flay> <20030204132048.D16744@suse.de> <172980000.1044373858@[10.10.2.4]> X-No-CC: Reply to lists, not to me. From: Momchil Velikov In-Reply-To: <172980000.1044373858@[10.10.2.4]> Date: 10 Feb 2003 14:13:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87y94owcyz.fsf@fadata.bg> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 589 Lines: 10 >>>>> "Martin" == Martin J Bligh writes: Martin> But the point is still the same ... even if it is doing Martin> more agressive optimisation, it's not actually buying us Martin> anything (at least for the kernel) which might be due in part to ``-fno-strict-aliasing'' used to compile the Linux kernel. ~velco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/