Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:48:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:48:38 -0500 Received: from wohnheim.fh-wedel.de ([195.37.86.122]:39859 "EHLO wohnheim.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:48:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:58:22 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: SA Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: interrupt latency ? Message-ID: <20030210135822.GA14827@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <200302071850.52781.no_spam@ntlworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200302071850.52781.no_spam@ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 818 Lines: 24 On Fri, 7 February 2003 18:50:52 +0000, SA wrote: > > What latency should I expect for hardware interrupts under k2.4 / i386 ? > > > ie how long should it take between the hardware signalling the interrupt and > the interrupt handler being called? Upper limit should be ~10,000 clock cycles. Doing some tests on ppc, some rtos was able to react within 200 cycles, linux took 1000 or so. Add whatever time you handler (the c code) takes. J?rn -- When you close your hand, you own nothing. When you open it up, you own the whole world. -- Li Mu Bai in Tiger & Dragon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/