Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752371AbbGMQzz (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:55:55 -0400 Received: from relmlor2.renesas.com ([210.160.252.172]:49229 "EHLO relmlie1.idc.renesas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751671AbbGMQzw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:55:52 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,463,1432566000"; d="scan'208";a="191423232" From: Phil Edworthy To: Sergei Shtylyov , "Kishon Vijay Abraham I" CC: Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , "Mark Rutland" , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Yoshihiro Shimoda , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] phy: rcar-gen2 usb: Add Host/Function switching for USB0 Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3] phy: rcar-gen2 usb: Add Host/Function switching for USB0 Thread-Index: AQHQuKwjcYvjF2RvDkeFG+0NoRt2Cp3U67UAgAQ2M3CAABbzAIAASK4AgAAhc4CAAAC1AA== Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:55:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1436270121-25924-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy@renesas.com> <559FF47A.5000001@cogentembedded.com> <55A39030.1030601@cogentembedded.com> <55A3E937.2050804@cogentembedded.com> In-Reply-To: <55A3E937.2050804@cogentembedded.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: cogentembedded.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [193.141.220.21] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;SIXPR06MB0922;5:kFtxug7XtYL/FkNRpTRAUctLymM58DWkt7IBjk4nPyrLMN9AnH8gbWXvBdga8gVwtbAa1ehySGnVd5MkLkLZzXoyZp7ANJ1WzOMPYfErWvWeF5DPuWiPNKt9sZFNhzJQ2TGvST+Q3LIOKus6Vz9G0g==;24:mB+SnBN3Zs5c7QWng6EbGIyQrXCCcZ1P0wOM0TfNxglsu0RBNd45wunPcC3+1FEbCQcpBTTusvj9FYw8myD3XAWMJYKIy8ey9rBczf9m7GI=;20:L+/gWVPWLTwmJHufu/AbOhvSCWWlo31eTudTtHG5jn/KkGdIHYFhPGPn28v1E2JHF5S9vVmDewHp8GtcPlx8btTWU9vNspq4vPBC3s/Xc73IJ/QWeD1J93bRkNFUvwlDSP8vx4G2goHJ3JPmV67wyQKq8aa3HyhZ3YVN6LdRHWw= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SIXPR06MB0922; sixpr06mb0922: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001);SRVR:SIXPR06MB0922;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SIXPR06MB0922; x-forefront-prvs: 0636271852 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(24454002)(51704005)(479174004)(74316001)(189998001)(33656002)(5001960100002)(86362001)(77096005)(93886004)(87936001)(2656002)(62966003)(122556002)(2950100001)(106116001)(77156002)(46102003)(40100003)(102836002)(2900100001)(76576001)(5002640100001)(5003600100002)(92566002)(66066001)(76176999)(50986999)(54356999);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:SIXPR06MB0922;H:SIXPR06MB0639.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: renesas.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Jul 2015 16:55:40.1258 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 53d82571-da19-47e4-9cb4-625a166a4a2a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SIXPR06MB0922 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3602 Lines: 89 Hi Sergei, On 13 July 2015 17:37, Sergei wrote: > On 07/13/2015 06:02 PM, Phil Edworthy wrote: > > >>>>> Instead of statically selecting the PHY connection to either the > >>>>> USBHS (Function) or PCI0 (Host) IP blocks, this change allows the > >>>>> dts to specifiy gpio pins for the vbus and id signals. Additional > > >>>> These GPIOs don't have anything to do with the PHY, they're interfacing > > >> Perhaps that was too strong statement but nevertheless... > > > Looking at your MAX3355 extcon driver, I can't see how it would work on it's > > own. > > I've added the 'extcon' support into the Renesas USBHS driver, so that it > should be able to sense the ID pin status. > > > The system needs to sense vbus in order to determine that the board > > has been plugged into a USB Host. > > > Since the MAX3355 device doesn't > > directly provide any vbus signals, this shouldn't be part of the extcon driver, > > so where should it be? > > Sure, MAX3355 does provide voltage on Vbus, controlled by -OFFVBUS input. > It's just that the driver has only ID sensing support. > Do you have the MAX3355 datasheet at all? Sorry, I meant that the max3355 device does not directly provide vbus signals suitable for input as a gpio. Though as it provides the vbus signal to the usb connector, there is no reason this can't be used as a gpio input to rcar (just a level shifter needed ala the Koelsch board). > > On the other hand, the MAX3355 has a pair of status pins that can be used > > to get vbus instead. > > Sure, these bits reflect 4 OTG Vbus thresholds. > > > If these pins aren't used for other functions, maybe > > it's better to use these in the extcon driver. > > They are not. My comments were based on the view that vbus output from the max3355 device wasn't a signal that could be input to the rcar via gpio. Since it is, I agree that we should use that! > > My intention is to make the USB PHY driver listen for extcon events instead > > of directly accessing the ID and VBUS signals, but otherwise behave in the > > same way it currently does. > > I'm not sure the PHY driver should be interested in that... Then how is the PHY going to know when to switch between pci0 (host) and hsusb (function)? > > After reading some other threads, I also intend to set up a fixed regulator > > for the MAX3355 device to setup the shutdown and vbus enable pins. I know > > that the vbus enable should really be controlled some other way depending > > on the role, but for the moment I think it's ok just to enable it always. > > It's OK only in the host mode. > I don't think we need regulators. SHDN- is already supported by the driver > (though it only drives it high at start-up time), in fact it was the only reason > not to use gpio. > > > Do you think that is the correct way to progress this? > > I didn't have a clear picture how to implement the OTG support at the time > of writing the MAX3355 driver; actually, I was tasked to only support ID p[in > sensing. Right, so the max3355 driver needs some changes to include vbus handling. Are you working on this, or should I take it on? > Note that there's some ongoing effort now on linux-usb to support OTG > functionality. Yes, I need to spend some time reading that list! > > Thanks > > Phil > > WBR, Sergei Thanks Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/