Message-ID: <1436812644.1391.375.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virt: IRQ bypass manager
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger@st.com,
        eric.auger@linaro.org, joro@8bytes.org, avi.kivity@gmail.com,
        feng.wu@intel.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:37:24 -0600
In-Reply-To: <55A0348F.606@redhat.com>
References: <20150710173825.1031.42542.stgit@gimli.home>
	 <55A0348F.606@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1099
Lines: 27

On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 23:09 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> On 10/07/2015 19:52, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Perhaps if a second consumer comes along that would be justification for
> > tying it elsewhere in the build system.  ARM will obviously need to do
> > similar.  Are there better options?
> > 
> > Also, there's no maintainer for the top level virt/ directory.  Paolo,
> > would you feel comfortable taking this, maybe with some additional acks?
> 
> That's okay; alternatively, we can share it since after all you wrote
> most of it.

Sure.  Actually my wording was confusing, I was actually just suggesting
the patch be merged through the KVM tree since I think the consumer code
is going to be significantly bulkier than the producer code.  I can
certainly add a MAINTAINERS entry for virt/lib/ that we can share if you
like.  Thanks,

Alex


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/