Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:24:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:24:42 -0500 Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:26309 "EHLO waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:24:41 -0500 Message-Id: <200302101301.h1AD1DE2001067@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> To: Rusty Russell cc: Frank Davis , Vineet M Abraham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, brand@eeyore.valparaiso.cl Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.59 : drivers/net/fc/iph5526.c In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:34:02 +1100." <20030210014642.859B12C2C9@lists.samba.org> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:01:13 +0100 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1031 Lines: 23 Rusty Russell said: [...] > > - for (i = 0; i < clone_list[i].vendor_id != 0; i++) i < clone_list[i].vendor_id != 0 is (i < clone_list[i].vendor_id) != 0 is just i < clone_list[i].vendor_id, so the for is done for i = 0 and possibly for 1. Getting this effect (if desired) with an if is a load clearer. Having i twice in the condition is also highly suspicious... is this code ever executed? It looks like a bad screwup in the condition that went unnoticed because it was never hit. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/