Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753270AbbGNTUD (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:20:03 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:56303 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752301AbbGNTUB (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:20:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:19:58 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Fan Li Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND] f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file Message-ID: <20150714191958.GA78887@jaegeuk-mac02> References: <00b001d0b964$e403d930$ac0b8b90$@samsung.com> <00f201d0be1d$78aa7370$69ff5a50$@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00f201d0be1d$78aa7370$69ff5a50$@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2308 Lines: 57 On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:10:50PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chao Yu [mailto:yuchaochina@hotmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 12:16 AM > > To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND] f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file > > > > >From 8956df8fa1a669e8e476456e4afe0eccd8174684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Chao Yu > > Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:49:05 +0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file > > > > This patch moves extent cache related code from data.c into extent_cache.c > > since extent cache is independent feature, and its codes are not relate to > > others in data.c, it's better for us to maintain them in separated place. > > > > There is no functionality change, but several small coding style fixes > > including: > > * rename __drop_largest_extent to f2fs_drop_largest_extent for exporting; > > * rename misspelled word 'untill' to 'until'; > > * remove unneeded 'return' in the end of f2fs_destroy_extent_tree(). > > > > I think commit 0b84ceec9891 ("f2fs: don't try to split extents shorter than > F2FS_MIN_EXTENT_LEN") is conflict with commit 392a1c419916 ("f2fs: maintain > extent cache in separated file"), and it's not well resolved in dev-test. > > in commit 392a1c419916 ("f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file"): > > - if (dei.len > F2FS_MIN_EXTENT_LEN) { > > + if (dei.len > 1) { Good catch. Not a big deal, so I just resolved that in this patch. :) Thanks, > > So how about merging this patch (f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file) > first, and then merge Fan's patch? because one line modification in extent_cache.c > for fixing conflict seems much easier. > > BTW, I have already fixed the building error in this patch, you can directly > use the last sent patch in this thread showed in below link. :) > > http://sourceforge.net/p/linux-f2fs/mailman/message/34277570/ > > Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/