Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:59:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:59:04 -0500 Received: from angband.namesys.com ([212.16.7.85]:60034 "HELO angband.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:59:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:08:47 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.60 Message-ID: <20030211100847.B5850@namesys.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 859 Lines: 22 Hello! On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:08:28AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Networking, USB, SCSI, ALSA, ACPI, and various architecture updates (UML, > Sparc, ia64, ppc64 and ARM). One of yours hand merged UML updates/fixes in, and another one broke it badly by introducing sigprocmask(). Now there is a conflict between in-kernel sigprocmask() and glibc's sigprocmask() (that UML uses to manage signal delivery to right thread). Can we please change the name of in-kernel's sigprocmask() to avoid name clash? ;) Jeff Dike is also seem to support idea of renaming the offending function. Thank you. Bye, Oleg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/