Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753937AbbGOWsD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:48:03 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]:33869 "EHLO mail-yk0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753093AbbGOWsB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:48:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:47:58 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Michael Ellerman , David Rientjes , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Peter Zijlstra , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] powerpc/numa: fix cpu_to_node() usage during boot Message-ID: <20150715224758.GS15934@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20150702230202.GA2807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150715203516.GI15934@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150715224351.GH38815@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150715224351.GH38815@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 19 Hello, On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:43:51PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Ok, thank you for clarifying! From a correctness perspective, even if > the numbers don't match NUMA nodes, should we expect the grouping to be > split along NUMA topology? Yeap, the groups get formed according to the node distances. Nodes which are not at LOCAL_DISTANCE are always put in different groups. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/