Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:05:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:05:40 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:61056 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:05:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:11:19 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Heiko Ronsdorf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][DRIVER][RFC] CPU5 watchdog driver for 2.5 Message-ID: <20030211131119.GA13643@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Heiko Ronsdorf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030210201732.GA25722@mail.ihg.uni-duisburg.de> <1044916408.4724.11.camel@vmhack> <20030211122620.GA10604@mail.ihg.uni-duisburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030211122620.GA10604@mail.ihg.uni-duisburg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 818 Lines: 21 On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:26:20PM +0100, Heiko Ronsdorf wrote: > > * I'm pretty sure that in general adding new code to /proc (that has > > nothing to do with processes) is frowned on. > > I don't know how to track the watchdog. Suggestions are welcome. Last week someone suggested a sysfs interface for the watchdog drivers. If this is done, it should be in a generic way that all the watchdogs automatically benefit from rather than duplicate the same sysfs code in every watchdog driver. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/