Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:32:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:32:13 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:2749 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:32:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:41:43 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Jason Lunz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest] Message-ID: <20030211144143.GR930@suse.de> References: <20030209133013.41763.qmail@web41404.mail.yahoo.com> <20030209144622.GB31401@dualathlon.random> <20030210162301.GB443@elf.ucw.cz> <20030211114936.GE22275@dualathlon.random> <20030211124330.GK930@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 26 On Tue, Feb 11 2003, Jason Lunz wrote: > axboe@suse.de said: > > Coolest would to simply stack these schedulers any way you want. Sneak > > the uid based fairness scheduler in front of the pid based one, and > > you have per-user with per-process fairness. > > Which again reminds us of the network queueing. You all seem to be > reinventing alexey's wheel here. The above reminds me of HTB with SFQ > leaf nodes. There's no wheel reinventing here, just applying the goodies from network scheduling to disk scheduling. > By all means, do the same thing with disk i/o. It's been a smashing > success with packet queueing. Well, that's the point. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/