Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754877AbbGQFiN (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 01:38:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:33495 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751706AbbGQFiL (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 01:38:11 -0400 Message-ID: <55A894BC.8070401@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:08:04 +0530 From: Vaibhav Hiremath User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add support for configuration of dual phase on BUCK1 References: <1437070618-21330-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1437070618-21330-6-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150716203232.GA1602@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150716203232.GA1602@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 50 On Friday 17 July 2015 02:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:46:58PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > >> .disable = regulator_disable_regmap, >> .is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap, >> .get_current_limit = pm800_get_current_limit, >> + .set_current_limit = pm800_set_current_limit, > > set_current_limit() isn't the right interface to use for this, this is > something that depends on the physical design of the system rather than > something that limits the current. It should be a DT property of its > own. There are some other PMICs with similar functions but it's not > clear yet how generic the configuration mechanism is. > Hmmm, Yeah, right. This is depends on physical design. And not the regulator current limit. Earlier, I had submitted DT based approach, but was MFD DT property. Which is not correct, do you think regulator DT property is the right approach? Below is going to be my approach - pmic1: 88pm860@30 { compatible = "marvell,88pm800"; ... regulators { compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-regulator"; marvell,88pm860-buck1-dualphase-en; buck1: buck1 { ... }; ... }; }; Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/