Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756421AbbGQF7M (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 01:59:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:34179 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752420AbbGQF7L (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 01:59:11 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150708091928.38c7643a@gandalf.local.home> References: <20150708123148.GF12596@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150708091928.38c7643a@gandalf.local.home> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:59:10 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] trace: Trace log handler for logging into STM blocks From: Chunyan Zhang To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@redhat.com, Mathieu Poirier , Serge Broslavsky , broonie@kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , Lyra Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2242 Lines: 61 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:31:48 +0200 > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:10:43PM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote: >> > Add the function 'trace_event_stm_output_##call' for printing events >> > trace log into STM blocks. >> > >> > This patch also adds a function call at where the events have been >> > committed to ring buffer to export the trace event information to >> > STM blocks. >> >> So then you have two copies of the data, why that? Would a scheme were >> data either goes to the STM or the regular buffer not make much more >> sense? >> >> > +++ b/include/trace/perf.h >> > @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ trace_event_raw_event_##call(void *__data, proto) \ >> > { assign; } \ >> > \ >> > trace_event_buffer_commit(&fbuffer); \ >> > + trace_event_stm_log(&fbuffer); \ >> >> This makes every trace event slower. > > Of course this could use a jump label. > > But I agree, I think a switch to which buffer it should be sent to is > better. I could come up with a way to make the buffer more generic, and > have it switch between where the event is recorded. > Hello Steve, Please excuse my disturbing you again. May I get more details of how you want the code (including Trace Event and STM subsystem) will be reworked? I know you are very busy, maybe I can more or less help with something. I'm eager to do that, but the problem for now is I think I'm not in the same level for the understanding of next work we need to do. Do you have an exact solution already? or some ideas you want me to try? Looking forward to your reply, thank you! Chunyan > -- Steve > >> >> > } >> > /* >> > * The ftrace_test_probe is compiled out, it is only here as a build time check > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/