Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:36:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:36:30 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:63500 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:36:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:46:17 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: LA Walsh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@wirex.com Subject: Re: lsm truly "generic" allowing complete choice? Clean? Simple? I don't think so. Message-ID: <20030212114617.A4648@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , LA Walsh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@wirex.com References: <200302120142.34882.russell@coker.com.au> <000201c2d266$4daa51a0$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <000201c2d266$4daa51a0$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org>; from law@tlinx.org on Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:13:55PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 22 On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:13:55PM -0800, LA Walsh wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russell Coker > > > > I think that most people who want to use LSM and similar > > systems don't want to > > re-write any significant portion of their applications. > --- > I would agree -- that is true for _most_ people. This is eactly the wrong attitude. You need to carefull design an audit all application for a secure system. > Maybe I'd be able to configure out paging support as well.. That's CONFIG_SWAP in Linux 2.5.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/