MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150718035623.GA22664@treble.redhat.com>
References: <cover.1437150175.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> <2ea0f0602978178eafd012e52b8bdb83cfb159d5.1437150175.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <20150717194307.GA26757@gmail.com> <CALCETrVpVvr+eynj3dtByddY3Efwvuo=KuyMR_=7m3shzY9xyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150717203746.GB12761@treble.redhat.com> <20150718025116.GB13059@gmail.com> <20150718035623.GA22664@treble.redhat.com>
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:30:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCETrW9rnKRXwNVr2VMtbBuPRAwcEEQU8r-oOuHTrUNtmR2PA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/21] x86/asm/crypto: Fix frame pointer usage in aesni-intel_asm.S
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 553
Lines: 14

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> The reason I suggested to put FRAME in the macro name is to try to
> prevent it from being accidentally used for leaf functions, where it
> isn't needed.
>

Could someone remind me why it isn't needed for leaf functions?

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/