Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:12:30 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "kan.liang@intel.com" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
        "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
        "eranian@google.com" <eranian@google.com>,
        "adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        "dsahern@gmail.com" <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        "jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        "namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] perf/x86: special case per-cpu core misc PMU events
Message-ID: <20150720161230.GE19239@leverpostej>
References: <1437078831-10152-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
 <1437078831-10152-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
 <20150717122105.GD26091@leverpostej>
 <20150717201747.GF7380@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150717201747.GF7380@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 777
Lines: 20

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:17:47PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > As with my earlier comments, I don't think these can be grouped with
> > events (not even from the same PMU given their free-running nature).
> 
> Mark, we already went through this last time. There is nothing
> stopping handling free running counters as part of other groups.

Ok. It's inexact (but only marginally), and not the end of the world if
you know that's the case.

My concern last time was mainly with the grouping of uncore and CPU
events.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/