Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:48:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:48:48 -0500 Received: from rrzs2.rz.uni-regensburg.de ([132.199.1.2]:40137 "EHLO rrzs2.rz.uni-regensburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:48:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:58:36 +0100 From: Christian Guggenberger To: rl@hellgate.ch, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: via rhine bug? (timeouts and resets) Message-ID: <20030212155836.A797@pc9391.uni-regensburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Balsa 1.2.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 883 Lines: 14 >> I'd be happy to test via-rhine stuff, but my boxes don't generally like >> 2.5.x so I can only usefully test 2.4.x fixes > > No prob. AFAIK the only significant difference 2.4/2.5 is the change you > made in 2.4.21pre4-ac1 (which, being short of IO-APIC hw, I can't test): > > o Always set interrupt line with VIA northbridge (me) > | Should fix apic mode problems with USB/audio/net on VIA boards > Can you please send a patch against 2.5.60, cause I would like to test these IO APIC things on my via board. 2.4-ac is no choice for me, since patching xfs into 2.4-ac is a little bit too painful for me;-) Christian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/