Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:21:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:20:50 -0500 Received: from host55.osagesoftware.com ([209.142.225.55]:34567 "EHLO nic.osagesoftware.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:20:40 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010216211931.00c6d360@mail.osagesoftware.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:20:34 -0500 To: From: David Relson Subject: re: XOR [ was: Linux stifles innovation... ] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20010216194121.B26627@alcove.wittsend.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 08:52 PM 2/16/01, you wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > You know XOR is patented (yes, the logical bit operation XOR). > > But wasn't that Xerox that had that? > > US Patent #4,197,590 held by NuGraphics, Inc. The patent was for using the technique of using XOR for dragging/moving parts of a graphics image without erasing other parts. Also, since the patent was granted in 1980, the inventors have had their 17 years of patent protection, and we're all free to use the technique - legally! David P.S. Given that XOR is a basic boolean operation, I don't think the USPTO would ever be so dumb as to grant a patent on it. But, then the PTO has shown a creative ability to grant patents to questionable ideas, so who can say what they would/could/will do? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/