Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932962AbbGUPJt (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:09:49 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0018.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.18]:33159 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932067AbbGUPJs (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:09:48 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2895:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4250:4321:5007:6238:6261:7514:7875:7903:9040:9901:10004:10400:10450:10455:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12555:12740:13019:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:14096:14097:19904:19999:21067:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: jelly06_383d26b840618 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2175 Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:09:44 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jungseok Lee Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Byungchul Park Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Introduce two additional marks for delay Message-ID: <20150721110944.6c3138ef@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <4B29B132-6D19-475C-8E08-1232AAE8AD31@gmail.com> References: <1436626300-1679-1-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com> <1436626300-1679-3-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com> <4B29B132-6D19-475C-8E08-1232AAE8AD31@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1401 Lines: 35 On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:56:31 +0900 Jungseok Lee wrote: > Recently, I've noticed that there is a minor, not logical, flaw in the > above hunk as reviewing patches which do not get any signals yet. It is > a lack of 's' in msec in comment. That is, my latest one is as follows. > > + MARK(100000000ULL , '@'), /* 100 msecs */ > + MARK(10000000ULL , '*'), /* 10 msecs */ > > I know it's definitely trivial, but I've updated it to align with other > comments and planned to resend the patch. Surprisingly, this patch > has been already staged on your repo. So, I leave a whole patch again > including your SOB since I don't know how to handle this. > > Thanks you for reviewing my patch! The original is in the process of going through my tests. I waited till rc3 to come out to rebase all my work on it (including this patch) and restated testing again. I tripped on some things that are still buggy in -rc3 (which delays the finishing of my testing). As it is in the testing phase, I wont be modifying it. If you want, just send another patch on top of my ftrace/core branch, and I can add that to my queue too. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/