Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:31:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:31:09 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:2820 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:31:06 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200302121841.h1CIfDUe007962@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading... To: scott@coyotegulch.com (Scott Robert Ladd) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:41:13 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Scott Robert Ladd" at Feb 12, 2003 01:17:27 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1143 Lines: 28 > > So, it's working great for me :) > > I always wonder what should be said by testers when beta software actually > *works*. ;) > > I've been successfully running 2.5.60 on my Tycho system since a few minutes > after Linus announced it. The major bugs I'd had in 2.5.59 were with Alsa, > which seems to be running well in 2.5.60. > > I wonder if testers should post configs that worked, so developers can > compare against configs that failed? Feel free to open a 'bug report' on my bug database just to upload a working .config - I.E. you can use it as a somewhat-organised, and comment-onable .config storage repository, if that's any use. http://grabjohn.com/kernelbugdatabase/ If there is sufficient interest, I can add some code to pick out the common config options out of a set of config files, or whatever you want. Just ask, and the feature will be, (eventually), added :-) John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/