Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:50:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:50:35 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:23952 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:50:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:55:39 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Scott Robert Ladd Cc: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Subject: Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading... Message-ID: <20030212185539.GA20660@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Scott Robert Ladd , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" References: <3E4A6DBD.8050004@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 627 Lines: 19 On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:17:27PM -0500, Scott Robert Ladd wrote: > I wonder if testers should post configs that worked, so developers can > compare against configs that failed? Please don't. .configs tend to be huge, and a flood of 'me too' type posts will increase size of linux-kernel dramatically. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/