Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267714AbTBMChC>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:37:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267715AbTBMChC>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:37:02 -0500
Received: from bjl1.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:24448 "EHLO
	bjl1.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267714AbTBMChC>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:37:02 -0500
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:47:51 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0
Message-ID: <20030213024751.GA14016@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk>
References: <20030206021029.GW19678@dualathlon.random>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030206021029.GW19678@dualathlon.random>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 692
Lines: 15

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I guess the bitkeeper network protocol could be also implemented on the
> longer run, it should be much faster to fetch all the database that way,

Nobody (who is covered by copyright laws) is allowed to use the _free_
version of BitKeeper to reverse engineer the protocol.  I may be
mistaken - perhaps the BitKeeper "anti-competition" clause would be
found unenforcable.. but I'm not interested in going there.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/