Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:46:40 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
        konrad.wilk@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
        boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch V4 1/3] usb: Add Xen pvUSB protocol description
Message-ID: <20150722234640.GA29425@kroah.com>
References: <1435042405-14235-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
 <1435042405-14235-2-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1435042405-14235-2-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+102 (2ca89bed6448) (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 990
Lines: 27

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Add the definition of pvUSB protocol used between the pvUSB frontend in
> a Xen domU and the pvUSB backend in a Xen driver domain (usually Dom0).
> 
> This header was originally provided by Fujitsu for Xen based on Linux
> 2.6.18.
> 
> Changes are:
> - adapt to Linux style guide
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
>  include/xen/interface/io/usbif.h | 252 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Why is this a different interface than the existing ones we have today
(i.e. usbip?)  Where is it documented?  Do the Xen developers /
maintainers agree with this interface and code?  I need their sign-off
before I can accept such a thing.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/