Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:56:22 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: cl@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and
 pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice
Message-ID: <20150723015622.GA8369@dhcp-17-102.nay.redhat.com>
References: <1437404130-5188-1-git-send-email-bhe@redhat.com>
 <1437404130-5188-2-git-send-email-bhe@redhat.com>
 <20150721152840.GG15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <20150722000357.GA1834@dhcp-17-102.nay.redhat.com>
 <20150722135237.GJ15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <20150722142900.GA1737@dhcp-17-102.nay.redhat.com>
 <20150722143729.GM15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150722143729.GM15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 846
Lines: 22

On 07/22/15 at 10:37am, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:29:00PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > So if no reserved_size dyn_size is assigned to zero, and is checked to
> > > > see if dchunk need be created in below code:
> > > 
> > > Hmmm... but then pcpu_reserved_chunk is NULL so there still is no
> > > duplicate on the list, no?
> > 
> > Yes, you are quite right. I was mistaken. So NACK this patch.
> 
> But, yeah, it'd be great if we can add a WARN_ON() to ensure that this
> really doesn't happen along with some comments.

Posted [patch v3 2/3] as you suggested.

Thanks a lot!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/