Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 03:10:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 03:10:00 -0500 Received: from angband.namesys.com ([212.16.7.85]:28552 "HELO angband.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 03:10:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:19:50 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Jeff Dike Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.60 Message-ID: <20030213111950.A1369@namesys.com> References: <200302130412.XAA05507@ccure.karaya.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302130412.XAA05507@ccure.karaya.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 26 Hello! On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:12:38PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > The only other solution I see is to rename the kernel sigprocmask. Oleg Drokin > has done with this with a > -Dsigprocmask=__sigprocmask > on kernel code compiles, and I've done it at link time with objcopy. This This is a bit incorrect. I do -Dsigprocmask=__sigprocmask on user code part of UML. I found that glibc (at least the one I have) defines sigprocmask as weak symbol, but there is __sigprocmask already that has same address as sigprocmask. Also this does not work for dynamic build for some reason. > Anyway, if there's something better, I really want to know about it. Yeah, someone please come up with the better way. Please! Bye, Oleg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/