Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 04:09:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 04:09:09 -0500 Received: from red.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.70]:45478 "EHLO red.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 04:08:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 09:08:24 +0000 (GMT) From: James Sutherland To: "Michael H. Warfield" cc: Dan Hollis , Carlos Fernandez Sanz , "David D.W. Downey" , Rik van Riel , Alan Olsen , Mark Haney , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux stifles innovation... In-Reply-To: <20010216194121.B26627@alcove.wittsend.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:35:02PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: > > > I did some research on the patent database and found nothing regarding such > > > a patent. There's patent on word processors (not the concept but related to) > > > and uses tab on the description...and that patent is from 1980. > > > You know XOR is patented (yes, the logical bit operation XOR). > > But wasn't that Xerox that had that? Yeah, the same ones that > screwed us over with the compression patent that shot .gif images out > of the sky. There was inovation for you. That was Unisys, and it is certainly more innovative than XOR. (Or even FFT, which is also now patented in one form...) James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/