Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752896AbbGWNX5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:23:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:33199 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255AbbGWNXu (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:23:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1433512783-8183-1-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <1433512783-8183-2-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:23:48 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq From: Octavian Purdila To: Linus Walleij Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Mika Westerberg , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Srinivas Pandruvada , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 43 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >> wrote: >>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>> >>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>> above. >>> >>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila >>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? > > Me or Torvalds? > > This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not > go through IIO. > Hi Linus, This patch fixes one issue introduced by "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have interrupt assigned" which I see it is merged in the GPIO for-next branch. That is why I thought you will pick it up, did I assume wrong? Thanks, Tavi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/