Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753231AbbGWNcM (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:32:12 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:32969 "EHLO mail-oi0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752542AbbGWNbm (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:31:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1433512783-8183-1-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <1433512783-8183-2-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:31:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq From: Linus Walleij To: Octavian Purdila Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Mika Westerberg , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Srinivas Pandruvada , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 998 Lines: 32 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Octavian Purdila wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Me or Torvalds? >> >> This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not >> go through IIO. >> > > Hi Linus, > > This patch fixes one issue introduced by "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to > indicate that device does not have interrupt assigned" which I see it > is merged in the GPIO for-next branch. That is why I thought you will > pick it up, did I assume wrong? Aha yeah O already forgot that I merged that. That patch is not in -next, it is already in Torvalds' tree. So fixes can be merged directly through the IIO tree without any GPIO dependencies. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/