Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753697AbbGWOio (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:38:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:35635 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752095AbbGWOie (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:38:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150723140516.A3C9E4314B@saturn.retrosnub.co.uk> References: <1433512783-8183-1-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <1433512783-8183-2-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <20150723140516.A3C9E4314B@saturn.retrosnub.co.uk> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:38:33 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq From: Octavian Purdila To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Srinivas Pandruvada , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1676 Lines: 43 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:05 PM, wrote: > > Octavian Purdila writes: >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >> wrote: >>> >>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>> above. >>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila >>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg >> >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? >> Thanks, >> Tavi > > Hi Tavi, > This is fine, but is there a particular rush to get it in? > Otherwise I'll just take it through the IIO tree. > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron Hi Jonathan, Didn't mean to rush things, I haven't seen any activity on this for some time and thought it was forgotten. I was also confused with the status of Mika's patch, but now that I learned it was merged in 4.2, its clear to me that this patch needs to go through the IIO tree. Thanks, Tavi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/