Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753642AbbGWTZU (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:25:20 -0400 Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:55758 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753295AbbGWTZS (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:25:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq To: Octavian Purdila , Jonathan Cameron References: <1433512783-8183-1-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <1433512783-8183-2-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <20150723140516.A3C9E4314B@saturn.retrosnub.co.uk> Cc: Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Srinivas Pandruvada , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, lkml From: Jonathan Cameron Message-ID: <55B13F9B.1030905@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:25:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2027 Lines: 55 On 23/07/15 15:38, Octavian Purdila wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:05 PM, wrote: >> >> Octavian Purdila writes: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>>> above. >>>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila >>>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg >>> >>> >>> Hi Jonathan, >>> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >>> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? >>> Thanks, >>> Tavi >> >> Hi Tavi, >> This is fine, but is there a particular rush to get it in? >> Otherwise I'll just take it through the IIO tree. >> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron > > Hi Jonathan, > > Didn't mean to rush things, I haven't seen any activity on this for > some time and thought it was forgotten. A not entirely false assumption. I'd marked it in my email as to be applied then it got buried. oops and sorry about that. > I was also confused with the > status of Mika's patch, but now that I learned it was merged in 4.2, > its clear to me that this patch needs to go through the IIO tree. > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out as testing for autobuilders to play with it. Thanks, Jonathan > Thanks, > Tavi > A -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/