Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:13:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:13:50 -0500 Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-1-235.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.251.23.235]:48077 "EHLO awak") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:13:49 -0500 Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0 From: Xavier Bestel To: Larry McVoy Cc: Rik van Riel , Jamie Lokier , Andrea Arcangeli , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030213161337.GA9654@work.bitmover.com> References: <20030206021029.GW19678@dualathlon.random> <20030213024751.GA14016@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk> <20030213161337.GA9654@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Organization: Message-Id: <1045153390.13507.7.camel@bip.localdomain.fake> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 13 Feb 2003 17:23:10 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 683 Lines: 16 Le jeu 13/02/2003 ? 17:13, Larry McVoy a ?crit : > We'd view reverse engineering the protocol as falling under the "you're > working on a competing implementation". > > The general message is that you are free to use BK but you aren't free > to use BK in any way which could hurt the business which produces BK. If this kind of rule was enforced, lots of drivers wouldn't have existed. You can't do much against reverse engineering. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/