Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:01:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:01:37 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:12295 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:01:36 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200302131711.h1DHBduR014118@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading... To: plars@linuxtestproject.org (Paul Larson) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:11:38 +0000 (GMT) Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, edesio@ieee.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, edesio@task.com.br In-Reply-To: <1045155336.28494.14.camel@plars> from "Paul Larson" at Feb 13, 2003 10:55:34 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 18 > > Nothing stops people from LTPtesting the -bk nightlies. > > Sure, they won't catch the last-minute-torvalds-breaks-the-compile > > type bugs, but for the most part it should be useful enough info. > Already been doing that for a long time now. How about a quick note out > to lkml that says "The current bk is what I'm going to release at Time> today unless someone gives me a good reason not to."? Why? That would just delay releases, and make more work for Linus. If a release is badly broken, another one is usually quick to follow it, anyway. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/