Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:27:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:27:33 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:34077 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:27:31 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200302131837.h1DIbIh14604@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: EtherLeak generic fix - for feedback & testing. To: ashishk@caldera.com (Ashish Kalra) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:37:18 -0500 (EST) Cc: davem@redhat.com, ak@muc.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@redhat.com, akpm@zip.com.au, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, ashishk@sco.com In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.20030213175200.006cf7cc@indus.asia.caldera.com> from "Ashish Kalra" at Feb 13, 2003 05:52:06 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 556 Lines: 11 > This is a kernel-2.4.13 patch for a "generic" fix for the Etherleak security > issue and it works without making modifications to network device drivers. The right approach is to fix all the drivers so thats what we did. I can see why a distro fix for an ancient kernel would be done the way you did though. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/