Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:25:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:25:31 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:16653 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:25:30 -0500 Message-ID: <3E4C2B9B.8000509@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:34:51 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jochen Friedrich CC: Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds , mike_phillips@urscorp.com, phillim2@comcast.net Subject: Re: [BUG] smctr.c changes in latest BK References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 543 Lines: 15 Jochen Friedrich wrote: > After taking a second look, i just recognized that both cases (MAC adress > all-zero or not) are handled exactly the same (by duplicated code), so the > whole stuff is unnecessary. > > The whole function just reduces to a simple copy loop: yep, you're right. applied. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/