Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:28:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:28:50 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:36881 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:28:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:35:20 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts comparsion - two irqs for i8042? In-Reply-To: <20030212091916.1989c531.rddunlap@osdl.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1428 Lines: 38 On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Do you have a PS/2 mouse enabled/configured in 2.4? > I do, and it shows this on 2.4.20: > > 0: 78505022 XT-PIC timer > 1: 305438 XT-PIC keyboard > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade > 3: 2013477 XT-PIC xirc2ps_cs > 5: 0 XT-PIC usb-uhci > 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc > 10: 4 XT-PIC i82365 > 11: 2188569 XT-PIC i82365, cs46xx > 12: 1555382 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse > 14: 872963 XT-PIC ide0 > 15: 3 XT-PIC ide1 > > and the driver code certainly requests IRQ 12 for the PS/2 mouse > when it's configured. I would agree that the identification is far more useful in 2.4, but it still takes the same number of IRQ. Could I ask why the usage information has been de-clarified without starting a flame war on the politics of the change? I assume there's a good reason for not just identifying the usage to those who haven't memorized the PC interrupt defaults. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/