Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:09:50 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
        dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dmaengine: Add an enum for the dmaengine
 alignment constraints
Message-ID: <20150727090950.37122de2@free-electrons.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150727064804.GN2564@lukather>
References: <1437381693-18948-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
	<20150720110325.502af335@free-electrons.com>
	<20150727064804.GN2564@lukather>
Organization: Free Electrons
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 766
Lines: 24

Maxime,

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:48:04 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:

> I could, but all the rest of the other similar case so far in
> dmaengine are made through enum, so I guess it's still better for
> consistency. And we also provide a comprehensive list of the valid
> values this way, something a function would not provide (or at least
> not at compilation time)

Alright, makes sense.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/