Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752171AbbG0LBl (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:01:41 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:52360 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751217AbbG0LBk (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:01:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:01:39 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "rth@twiddle.net" , "vgupta@synopsys.com" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "hskinnemoen@gmail.com" , "realmz6@gmail.com" , "dhowells@redhat.com" , "rkuo@codeaurora.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "geert@linux-m68k.org" , "james.hogan@imgtec.com" , "ralf@linux-mips.org" , "jejb@parisc-linux.org" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "cmetcalf@ezchip.com" , "ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" , "mingo@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] arch: Provide atomic logic ops Message-ID: <20150727110139.GG3358@arm.com> References: <20150716172110.587529075@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150716172110.587529075@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1114 Lines: 30 Hi Peter, Ingo, On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 06:21:10PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Currently there is an incoherent mess of atomic_{set,clear}_mask() and > atomic_or() (but no atomic_{and,nand,xor}()) in the tree. > > Those archs that implement atomic_{set,clear}_mask() are not even consistent on > its signature. > > Implement atomic_{or,and,xor}() on all archs and deprecate > atomic_{set,clear}_mask(). > > The series has been compile tested by the build-bot, no known failures at this time. > > I would like to take this through tip; I'll ask Ingo to put it in a separate > branch such that people can pull in that branch if there is conflicting work > elsewhere (Will has some for Argh64). Any joy with this branch? I'd like to put the new arm64 atomics into -next, but it would probably be easier for everybody if I merged in this lot first. Cheers, Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/