Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752971AbbG0LL4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:11:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:38347 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbbG0LLJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:11:09 -0400 Message-ID: <55B611AF.4030600@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:10:39 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torvald Riegel , Thomas Gleixner CC: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra , Darren Hart , "Carlos O'Donell" , Ingo Molnar , Jakub Jelinek , "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Davidlohr Bueso , Arnd Bergmann , Steven Rostedt , Linux API , Roland McGrath , Darren Hart , Anton Blanchard , Eric Dumazet , bill o gallmeister , Jan Kiszka , Daniel Wagner , Rich Felker , Andy Lutomirski , bert hubert , Rusty Russell , Heinrich Schuchardt Subject: Re: Revised futex(2) man page for review References: <55166C01.7000803@gmail.com> <20150328114725.GJ27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1429093725.2909.29.camel@triegel.csb> In-Reply-To: <1429093725.2909.29.camel@triegel.csb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1771 Lines: 46 On 04/15/2015 12:28 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 23:40 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 09:53:21AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>>> So, please take a look at the page below. At this point, >>>> I would most especially appreciate help with the FIXMEs. >>> >>> For people who cannot read that troff gibberish (me).. >> >> Ditto :) >> >>> NOTES >>> Glibc does not provide a wrapper for this system call; call it using >>> syscall(2). >> >> You might mention that pthread_mutex, pthread_condvar interfaces are >> high level wrappers for the syscall and recommended to be used for >> normal use cases. IIRC unnamed semaphores are implemented with futexes >> as well. > > If we add this, I'd rephrase it to something like that there are > high-level programming abstractions such as the pthread_condvar > interfaces or semaphores that are implemented using the syscall and that > are typically a better fit for normal use cases. I'd consider only the > condvars as something like a wrapper, or targeting a similar use case. I added this under NOTES: Various higher-level programming abstractions are implemented via futexes, including POSIX threads mutexes and condition variables, as well as POSIX semaphores. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/