Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 04:48:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 04:48:31 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:21456 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 04:47:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 01:58:02 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Dave Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.60-mm2 Message-Id: <20030214015802.66800166.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030214093856.GC13845@codemonkey.org.uk> References: <20030214013144.2d94a9c5.akpm@digeo.com> <20030214093856.GC13845@codemonkey.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2003 09:57:38.0458 (UTC) FILETIME=[81A6B7A0:01C2D40F] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1615 Lines: 45 Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:31:44AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > . Considerable poking at the NFS MAP_SHARED OOM lockup. It is limping > > along now, but writeout bandwidth is poor and it is still struggling. > > Needs work. > > > > . There's a one-liner which removes an O(n^2) search in the NFS writeback > > path. It increases writeout bandwidth by 4x and decreases CPU load from > > 100% to 3%. Needs work. > > I'm puzzled that you've had NFS stable enough to test these. This was just writing out a single 400 megabyte file with `dd'. I didn't try anything fancier. > How much testing has this stuff had? Here 2.5.60+bk clients fall over under > moderate NFS load. (And go splat quickly under high load). > > Trying to run things like dbench causes lockups, fsx/fstress made it > reboot, plus the odd 'cheating' errors reported yesterday. I have not tried pushing NFS with complex access patterns recently. BTW, there's a little patch in there from Trond which I forgot to mention: it implements sendfile for NFS, so loop-on-NFS works again. But we have a refcounting bug somewhere: # mount server:/dir /mnt/point # losetup /dev/loop0 /mnt/point/file # mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/loop0 # umount /mnt/loop0 # losetup -d /dev/loop0 # umount /mnt/point umount: /mnt/point: device is busy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/