Message-ID: <1438027733.25997.50.camel@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
        Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:08:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: <55B66ACB.6010702@hp.com>
References: <1437595962-21472-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
	 <1437595962-21472-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
	 <1437958584.25997.27.camel@stgolabs.net> <55B66ACB.6010702@hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 574
Lines: 16

On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:30 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Yes, we could change the loop to that. I was just following the same 
> logic in the native code.

Well since the native code obviously doesn't involve the
threshold/clear_pending, it looks fine to me. Its just the pv version I
think should be updated.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/