Message-ID: <55B69CED.8050709@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:04:45 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Uros Bizjak <uros_bizjak1@t-2.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: x86@kernel.org, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ASM flags in general
References: <1438019319-19731-1-git-send-email-uros_bizjak1@t-2.net> <55B680D8.5070702@zytor.com> <55B696B2.3000702@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <55B696B2.3000702@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1996
Lines: 52

On 07/27/2015 01:38 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> As long as we're thinking about this stuff, there are bunch of places
> where we use exception fixups and do awful things involving translating
> them to error codes.  Ideally they'd use as goto instead, but last time
> I checked, GCC was quite picky and didn't like output constraints and
> asm goto at the same time.  Maybe GCC could fix this at some point, but
> using condition code outputs might be reasonable, too.
> 
> Doing this would make put_user_ex and similar completely unnecessary, I
> think.
> 

No, I think this is wrong.  Exceptions and flags are almost each others
opposites.  Since C doesn't have native exception handling (except
setjmp/longjmp) we pretty much hack it.

asm goto() would indeed be the better way to do this, but again, would
in most cases require asm goto to support outputs.

However, get_user_ex and put_user_ex we really don't want to go away.
They produce extremely efficient code -- just a bunch of mov operations
-- for the common path, and that's the way we like it.

That being said, there probably are a couple of patterns where we could
do, say "stc" in the exception path, and emit CF as an output:

bool err;
int errno;

asm volatile("xor %1,%1\n"	/* Clears CF */
	     "1: something %3,%0\n"/* Leaves CF unchanged, or clears */
	     "2:\n"
             ".section .fixup.\"ax\"\n"
	     "3: mov %4,%1\n"
	     "   stc\n"
	     "   jmp 2b"
	     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,3b)
            : "=X" (output), "=r" (errno), "=@ccc" (err)
	    : "Y" (input), "i" (-EIO));

This would make "err" immediately testable.  However, it also might make
gcc generate extra code to save and restore err, since it wouldn't
understand the invariant that err = !!errno.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/