Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:12:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:12:11 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:38097 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:12:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 02:22:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Dave Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.60-mm2 Message-Id: <20030214022220.30d0ed69.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030214101356.GA17155@codemonkey.org.uk> References: <20030214013144.2d94a9c5.akpm@digeo.com> <20030214093856.GC13845@codemonkey.org.uk> <20030214015802.66800166.akpm@digeo.com> <20030214101356.GA17155@codemonkey.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2003 10:21:56.0455 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6AF6770:01C2D412] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 906 Lines: 24 Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:58:02AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I'm puzzled that you've had NFS stable enough to test these. > > This was just writing out a single 400 megabyte file with `dd'. I didn't try > > anything fancier. > > ok. Can you hold off pushing NFS bits to Linus until this gets > pinned down ? I really don't want to introduce any more variables > to this, especially when its so hard to pin down to an exact > replication scenario. I wouldn't push any NFS bits. It has a breathing maintainer ;) I've been mainly looking at the OOM problems, which need MM help. Got distracted. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/